“I buy on the assumption that they could close the market the next day and not reopen it for five years.”
— Warren Buffett
The investment philosophy practiced by Warren Buffett calls for investors to take a long-term horizon when making an investment, such as a five year holding period (or even longer), and reconsider making the investment in the first place if unable to envision holding the stock for at least five years. Today, we look at how such a long-term strategy would have done for investors in Prudential Financial Inc (NYSE: PRU) back in 2016, holding through to today.
|Average annual return:||8.96%|
As shown above, the five year investment result worked out well, with an annualized rate of return of 8.96%. This would have turned a $10K investment made 5 years ago into $15,358.03 today (as of 03/22/2021). On a total return basis, that’s a result of 53.60% (something to think about: how might PRU shares perform over the next 5 years?). [These numbers were computed with the Dividend Channel DRIP Returns Calculator.]
Notice that Prudential Financial Inc paid investors a total of $18.25/share in dividends over the 5 holding period, marking a second component of the total return beyond share price change alone. Much like watering a tree, reinvesting dividends can help an investment to grow over time — for the above calculations we assume dividend reinvestment (and for this exercise the closing price on ex-date is used for the reinvestment of a given dividend).
Based upon the most recent annualized dividend rate of 4.6/share, we calculate that PRU has a current yield of approximately 5.06%. Another interesting datapoint we can examine is ‘yield on cost’ — in other words, we can express the current annualized dividend of 4.6 against the original $72.83/share purchase price. This works out to a yield on cost of 6.95%.
One more piece of investment wisdom to leave you with:
“While it might seem that anyone can be a value investor, the essential characteristics of this type of investor-patience, discipline, and risk aversion-may well be genetically determined.” — Seth Klarman