“When we own portions of outstanding businesses with outstanding managements, our favorite holding period is forever.”
— Warren Buffett
Investors can learn a lot from Warren Buffett, whose above quote teaches the importance of thinking about investment time horizon, and asking ourselves before buying any given stock: can we envision holding onto it for years — even a two-decade holding period possibly?
Suppose a “buy-and-hold” investor was considering an investment into Nike (NYSE: NKE) back in 2000: back then, such an investor may have been pondering this very same question. Had they answered “yes” to a full two-decade investment time horizon and then actually held for these past 20 years, here’s how that investment would have turned out.
|Average annual return:||19.28%|
As shown above, the two-decade investment result worked out exceptionally well, with an annualized rate of return of 19.28%. This would have turned a $10K investment made 20 years ago into $340,558.49 today (as of 11/19/2020). On a total return basis, that’s a result of 3,306.67% (something to think about: how might NKE shares perform over the next 20 years?). [These numbers were computed with the Dividend Channel DRIP Returns Calculator.]
Always an important consideration with a dividend-paying company is: should we reinvest our dividends?Over the past 20 years, Nike has paid $7.65/share in dividends. For the above analysis, we assume that the investor reinvests dividends into new shares of stock (for the above calculations, the reinvestment is performed using closing price on ex-div date for that dividend).
Based upon the most recent annualized dividend rate of .98/share, we calculate that NKE has a current yield of approximately 0.74%. Another interesting datapoint we can examine is ‘yield on cost’ — in other words, we can express the current annualized dividend of .98 against the original $5.00/share purchase price. This works out to a yield on cost of 14.80%.
Another great investment quote to think about:
“Investing is the intersection of economics and psychology.” — Seth Klarman