Photo credit: commons.wikimedia.org

“I buy on the assumption that they could close the market the next day and not reopen it for five years.”

— Warren Buffett

The Warren Buffett investment philosophy calls for a long-term investment horizon, where a five year holding period, or even longer, would fit right into the strategy. How would such a strategy have worked out for an investment into MetLife Inc (NYSE: MET)? Today, we examine the outcome of a five year investment into the stock back in 2015.

Start date: 04/20/2015
$10,000

04/20/2015
$8,672

04/17/2020
End date: 04/17/2020
Start price/share: $45.20
End price/share: $33.06
Starting shares: 221.24
Ending shares: 262.29
Dividends reinvested/share: $7.72
Total return: -13.29%
Average annual return: -2.81%
Starting investment: $10,000.00
Ending investment: $8,672.45

As we can see, the five year investment result worked out poorly, with an annualized rate of return of -2.81%. This would have turned a $10K investment made 5 years ago into $8,672.45 today (as of 04/17/2020). On a total return basis, that’s a result of -13.29% (something to think about: how might MET shares perform over the next 5 years?). [These numbers were computed with the Dividend Channel DRIP Returns Calculator.]

Notice that MetLife Inc paid investors a total of $7.72/share in dividends over the 5 holding period, marking a second component of the total return beyond share price change alone. Much like watering a tree, reinvesting dividends can help an investment to grow over time — for the above calculations we assume dividend reinvestment (and for this exercise the closing price on ex-date is used for the reinvestment of a given dividend).

Based upon the most recent annualized dividend rate of 1.76/share, we calculate that MET has a current yield of approximately 5.32%. Another interesting datapoint we can examine is ‘yield on cost’ — in other words, we can express the current annualized dividend of 1.76 against the original $45.20/share purchase price. This works out to a yield on cost of 11.77%.

More investment wisdom to ponder:
“A risk-reward ratio is important, but so is an aggravation-satisfaction ratio.” — Muriel Siebert