“I buy on the assumption that they could close the market the next day and not reopen it for five years.”
— Warren Buffett
The investment philosophy practiced by Warren Buffett calls for investors to take a long-term horizon when making an investment, such as a five year holding period (or even longer), and reconsider making the investment in the first place if unable to envision holding the stock for at least five years. Today, we look at how such a long-term strategy would have done for investors in Ameriprise Financial Inc (NYSE: AMP) back in 2014, holding through to today.
|Average annual return:||7.20%|
The above analysis shows the five year investment result worked out well, with an annualized rate of return of 7.20%. This would have turned a $10K investment made 5 years ago into $14,157.09 today (as of 07/09/2019). On a total return basis, that’s a result of 41.56% (something to think about: how might AMP shares perform over the next 5 years?). [These numbers were computed with the Dividend Channel DRIP Returns Calculator.]
Beyond share price change, another component of AMP’s total return these past 5 years has been the payment by Ameriprise Financial Inc of $15.31/share in dividends to shareholders. Automatic reinvestment of dividends can be a wonderful way to compound returns, and for the above calculations we presume that dividends are reinvested into additional shares of stock. (For the purpose of these calcuations, the closing price on ex-date is used).
Based upon the most recent annualized dividend rate of 3.88/share, we calculate that AMP has a current yield of approximately 2.58%. Another interesting datapoint we can examine is ‘yield on cost’ — in other words, we can express the current annualized dividend of 3.88 against the original $120.27/share purchase price. This works out to a yield on cost of 2.15%.
One more investment quote to leave you with:
“I think you have to learn that there’s a company behind every stock, and that there’s only one real reason why stocks go up. Companies go from doing poorly to doing well or small companies grow to large companies.” — Peter Lynch