Photo credit: commons.wikimedia.org

“Only buy something that you’d be perfectly happy to hold if the market shut down for 10 years.”

— Warren Buffett

The Warren Buffett investment philosophy calls for a long-term investment horizon, where a ten year holding period, or even longer, would fit right into the strategy. How would such a strategy have worked out for an investment into Schlumberger Ltd (NYSE: SLB)? Today, we examine the outcome of a ten year investment into the stock back in 2009.

Start date: 06/11/2009
$10,000

06/11/2009
$7,097

06/10/2019
End date: 06/10/2019
Start price/share: $62.18
End price/share: $35.47
Starting shares: 160.82
Ending shares: 200.10
Dividends reinvested/share: $15.21
Total return: -29.02%
Average annual return: -3.37%
Starting investment: $10,000.00
Ending investment: $7,097.07

As shown above, the ten year investment result worked out poorly, with an annualized rate of return of -3.37%. This would have turned a $10K investment made 10 years ago into $7,097.07 today (as of 06/10/2019). On a total return basis, that’s a result of -29.02% (something to think about: how might SLB shares perform over the next 10 years?). [These numbers were computed with the Dividend Channel DRIP Returns Calculator.]

Always an important consideration with a dividend-paying company is: should we reinvest our dividends?Over the past 10 years, Schlumberger Ltd has paid $15.21/share in dividends. For the above analysis, we assume that the investor reinvests dividends into new shares of stock (for the above calculations, the reinvestment is performed using closing price on ex-div date for that dividend).

Based upon the most recent annualized dividend rate of 2/share, we calculate that SLB has a current yield of approximately 5.64%. Another interesting datapoint we can examine is ‘yield on cost’ — in other words, we can express the current annualized dividend of 2 against the original $62.18/share purchase price. This works out to a yield on cost of 9.07%.

More investment wisdom to ponder:
“The function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.” — John Galbraith